(Unnofficial) Next Deck

Yup.

Smaller units, reprints etc.

Big units have run riot to a certain extent and the nationality additions seem to be getting looser with each set.

An example on the former point regarding the soviets. They had I think the biggest submarine fleet at the start of the war and although results weren't great they were used extensively, but we still only have two in game. Most of the big stuff was used sparingly at best even down to destroyer size and yet many smaller unit types, used extensively, we still don't have.

It's really interesting to me how people can have such wildly different perspectives. The feedback from my gaming group is this deck and the last were pretty light on "sexy heavies." My own perception is they were on the "a little lighter than average" side.  

The ABC need fleshing out.
It's a poor state where a "what if" 4th/5th front (and alternative theatre) in the War At Sea in WW2 is incompletely supported. If you bring in one ABC nation, you got to commit to bringing in the rest.
It's like adding Germany without the UK, or Japan without the US.

Tee

The South American triumvirate of "superpowers" was a hot bed of military build up and diplomatic tension for decades. It's as valid to include this "what if?" smaller theatre of war as it is to include any number of "paper only" ships.

Or we can have a 5th Fletcher variant, a 4th Zero variant, another Iowa variant, a Siam fishing boat and a US jet. <note numbers are not accurate>

Tee

You points were definately raised during the set composition discussion Tee. And other options as well. There are simply never enough sets to do the things we want to everyones satisfaction.

I created a new thread where we can continue the ABC nations discussion more specifically.

We need a Texan/Harvard/Wirraway BTW, they gave them out like tictacs. If there was ever a 'Grey' fighter, that'd be the one