Post by gaz01 on Jul 15, 2024 2:51:31 GMT
I remember it being discussed but can't remember how long back and what thread it might have been in. The seperate Tirpitz 1941 date errata talk was definitely more recent.
I already have my Bismarcks/Tirpitz altered as mentioned but I haven't had hands on them for a while, so can't double check. Armour is definitely 9 on them though and I think MG was altered at least by +1 at range 3 on Bismarck at least. Can't recall what else was tweaked on the gunnery but it was on the back of that chat that I did it, which is probably longer ago than I thought. I'm also thinking now it might not have been on here...does anybody else recall it?!. Obviously Bismark was sent 1, which was without precedent and with attendant hindsight errors. She was the most powerfully balanced Battleship afloat for that short period (Yamato not disclosed), a fact obviously borne out both in gunnery and defensive success/endurance in action.
I already have my Bismarcks/Tirpitz altered as mentioned but I haven't had hands on them for a while, so can't double check. Armour is definitely 9 on them though and I think MG was altered at least by +1 at range 3 on Bismarck at least. Can't recall what else was tweaked on the gunnery but it was on the back of that chat that I did it, which is probably longer ago than I thought. I'm also thinking now it might not have been on here...does anybody else recall it?!. Obviously Bismark was sent 1, which was without precedent and with attendant hindsight errors. She was the most powerfully balanced Battleship afloat for that short period (Yamato not disclosed), a fact obviously borne out both in gunnery and defensive success/endurance in action.
(Fleet Command would have made a pretty good name for this set if Set V had not taken it)