Notionally, this unit was intended to be the first plan to convert the liner Augustus into a 'auxiliary carrier' in 1936.
It would eventually be converted to the Spaverio card we have. This is the closest, prewar carriers came to service for the RM.
However, because of the spaverio existing. Its probably worth discussing the conversion of the carricolio as well. The both amount to a similar early/inefficent carrier,around 30kt and 30000t. Aircraft is another limitation. While the stuka can provide an attack craft in 1940, there isnt a certain fighter option. And as the intent isn't to make a attack carrier, but a support carrier for alternate history versions of the major 1941 battles that needs to be addressed by operation or detachment options
Maybe we could give Falco the ability Italian Air Operations: This unit can base any Italian Fighter, Dive Bomber, or Torpedo Bomber. It will be more expensive, but gain a lot of versatility
University Student— Lover of Plato, Aristotle, War At Sea, Palestrina, and Mozart
It was delivered after the axis carrier pipedream fizzled. Its less about the specific romanian squadrons, more about the supositional carrier squadrons getting upgraded aircraft. The km is the only carrier equipped fleet without a basic A5 bomber. Elite bombers isn't a proper fix.
We end up with a italian version of hms Eagle. Cap 1 but more than a squadrons worth of force mulipliers.
Its ultimately grouper v splitter consideration. Either to group ju87s or to split by nation and serial number. I personally don't see great value in not just letting the romanian stuka stand infpr later production types and leave it at that. The original german and italian stuka are the early war heyday, the hypothetical fully navalised stuka is its own thing. Anf the romanian stuka is a later, improvef airframe.
What might be nifty is Composite Squadron: in the air placement step, a dive bomber based on this unit may be declared to be making either a 5dice anti-air attack or 2dice ASW attack instead of its usual attacks.