I have been following Mike Brady for about a year on his Oceanliner Designs YouTube pages. Informative and with superb CGI and graphics he looks at merchant shipping of all ages including highly detailed Titanic material. All good general maritime stuff.
However, he is branching out into naval rather than merchant now with one and a quarter hours (just published) on the Battle of North Cape otherwise known as the sinking of the KM Scharnhorst:
The 'lucky' Scharnhorst had already sunk HMS Rawalpindi and HMS Glorious in earlier actions but the ship's luck ran out with a northern twilight attempt at attacking a convoy to the Soviet Union. In a running battle with cruisers she was found and damaged twice while all the time the 14-inch gunned HMS Duke of York was bearing down on her.
Scharnorst nearly got away from DoY when DoY suffered radar damage but RN blindfire, as the range opened, sent one or more 14-inch projectiles slicing into her engine rooms and her speed fell rapidly.
Some of the best graphics I have seen and well worth a watch. Not mentioned is the fact that the Norwegian navy has now located the wreck and found it upside down in relatively shallow waters with some 60 metres blown off around the two forward turrets. It would appear the two forward magazines exploded at some point.
Given that Scharnhorst looks nothing like Bismarck I am not sure what you mean by 'lifted'. The graphics appear 100% original to the Mike Brady production.
I subscribed to him two months. Great channel, I love his German Ocean liner video. Really nice to see him branch out. Hopefully we see a Drachinifel collaboration in the future.
Erwin Rommel - "Give me American supply lines, British planes, German officers and Canadian troops, and I can take over the world".
I'd also highly recommend the "We Have Ways of Making you Talk" podcast, they just finished up an excellent series on the Battle of the North Cape and another on convoys in general.
On the Convoys episode, part 1, at the 26 minute mark the guy says that the German submarines never had a reasonable expectation that they could win the war. I thought that was interesting because if they didn’t, then Germany also didn’t have a chance of winning the war after the US joined the Allies. At that point it’s just a matter of time until the weight of North American industry steamrolls the German ability to make war.
What do you guys think about his assertion?
Last Edit: Feb 12, 2024 21:55:29 GMT by mnnorthstars
I was just reading a book on the development of submarines (from their invention through the nuclear era) that Dönitz had estimated the amount of tonnage required to reduce Great Britain, and that early in the war shortages of U-boats had made the Germans feel as if they could starve Britain, if only given the proper resources.
It is hard for me to imagine German submariners would have been as effective as they were if they did not believe they would achieve some result, and the entry of the US was accounted for as the second Happy Time; when reaching tonnage sunk goals became easier (though US production eventually outpaced sinking). I am inclined to see German submariners as pushing their luck towards a plausible (if ultimately infeasible) goal.
University Student— Lover of Plato, Aristotle, War At Sea, Palestrina, and Mozart
There’s certainly a time when they thought that they could help win the war, and a period when they definitely didn’t think that anymore. It’d be really hard to pinpoint when that switch flipped, though.