It’s a long yet interesting read. From a distance it seems like a carrier is a carrier and they all just do their thing, but each navy has its own way of doing things and you can’t just mix and match equipment/personnel/communications.
It’s a long yet interesting read. From a distance it seems like a carrier is a carrier and they all just do their thing, but each navy has its own way of doing things and you can’t just mix and match equipment/personnel/communications.
That's a godd summary. I also like the finding they had that Victorious was better at fighter direction and poorer at strikes (especially with heavy Avengers) and they swapped squadrons accordingly
I recently painted up a Victorious in this scheme on the WAS facebook group, haven't located a custom card for it though. I almost wonder if having a special "Armored Deck" SA or something as USS "Robin" essentially shrugged off a kamikaze hit and continued flight operations in a matter of hours. Also, it has US fire control and radar that was removed after being given back to the British so you could see some potential for giving it greater AA defense or something like the "Fighter Director" SA.
Some decent options there to spice up a mid-point US Carrier. It also carried US aircraft like F4Fs and TBFs,