Post by carriercrusader on Dec 17, 2019 1:44:38 GMT
One thing that always bugged me about the U-2511 was its "low" torpedo attack stat (3/3/2/-). Not only did the Type XXI have 6 forward torpedo tubes (as opposed to the 4 forward tubes in the type IX, which has the same torp stat line in WAS as the U-2511), but it carried an advanced torpedo reloading system which allowed it to reload all 6 tubes faster than a type VII could reload one tube. A "fix" for this that I though of would be to increase its stat line (4/3/3/2, potentially), or give it an ability to attack twice per turn, which would both come with a price increase. What are your thoughts?
In general, getting to a better torpedo line seems to take a very high number of tubes (Truculent) or long range torpedoes (Japan). Its worth noting the only significant difference in tubes between the Type-VII and the Type-IX is one aft facing tube, and there is a difference in torpedo stats (3/2/2 vs/ 3/3/2). This suggests RB (the designer) was giving some credit for the aft tubes and why he likely counted the 6 tubes on a Type XXI as roughly the same as the 6 total tubes on a Type-IX. Not perfect, but War at Sea isn't a particularly precise game.
I wish to have no connection with any ship that does not sail fast; for I intend to go in harm's way. - Captain John Paul Jones
In general, getting to a better torpedo line seems to take a very high number of tubes (Truculent) or long range torpedoes (Japan). Its worth noting the only significant difference in tubes between the Type-VII and the Type-IX is one aft facing tube, and there is a difference in torpedo stats (3/2/2 vs/ 3/3/2). This suggests RB (the designer) was giving some credit for the aft tubes and why he likely counted the 6 tubes on a Type XXI as roughly the same as the 6 total tubes on a Type-IX. Not perfect, but War at Sea isn't a particularly precise game.
I still think that while the Type XXI has “only” 6 tubes, it’s extremely high rate of Fire means that it should be at least on par with the Truculent, or have a special ability which addresses this.
In general, I don't think RB gave much credit for "rate of fire" on a number of weapons. For example, there is really no accounting for torpedo reload rates or number of reload torpedoes on surface ships. It would have been relatively rare for a surface ship to get off more than one salvo of torpedoes in a ship to ship engagement, but in War at Sea torpedo equipped ships can fire every turn, even if they really didn't have much in the way of reloads. With 23 reloads, U-2511 would probably be out of fish after 4-5 turns of shooting in the real world, but in War at Sea, she never stops.
That said, a cleaner way to do it might be a sister sub to U-2511 with an SA like Torpedo Salvo or Audacious Attack. No matter how high the rate of fire, a second salvo of torpedoes would still be...a second salvo, not part of a singular wave of torpedoes against a target.
Personally, I don't use U-2511 all that often because she lacks Wolfpack and her relatively high cost for the number of torpedoes she fires each turn. Her durability is pretty insane though (its a darn-near unsinkable sub). I generally find I get more bang for my buck with a couple 11-12 point subs. I wouldn't mind seeing a more aggressive boat from U-2511's class, but its always going to have stiff competition for "on-the-map" time from a more numerous pack of high-efficiency subs like U-510 and U-66. A second shot in a turn, even if only once per game, might change that calculus a bit. Could easily be talking about a sub that could cost 25+ points though, pretty pricey.
One more thought: Options for a historic U-2511 sisters that actually saw WWII service is pretty limited. Only U-2511 and U-3008 made war patrols, and U-3008's appears to have been pretty short lived. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_submarine_U-3008
Like a few other units, Type-XXI's are interesting, but they barely get across the line of really belonging in a WWII game. But if we can have Midway, Montana, Freddie the Fat, etc...why not I guess.
Always happy to see more of this class. Although late to the war, if Germany had been better organized about it, could have been a lot of these active. Less of a stretch than many things we do. Audacious attack seems like a good direction to go.