Is my understanding correct that we autorise Me 410 to be Land based only (and not land bomber with CV expert bonuses restrictions) and therefore accessing CV expert torpedoes bonuses?
That's what I was thinking, I then do not understand why we do have Land Fighter and Land Fighter-Bomber and not Land Bomber.
Why do new land TB and DB do not get Land Bomber if all other land planes have CV restrictions? That's illogical and certainly not fitting why the rules RB had pushed forward.
Can the team give an explaination better than just because? Point value or special abilities would not be an issue because we can adjust.
Let's have Expert torp (from Europa, Peter Strasser) and Shadowing (from Emily or Mavis) and I roll 5 dices... Meh... I fell ankward on that one
Actually, I think it just never came up. I have never seen a proposal specifically for a "Land Bomber" SA. I agree it would have been appropriate here.
The IJN Carrier Liberation Force - "Because We Care" Join the IJNCVLF. Service Guarantees Citizenship!
My take on expert abilities. I believe they are representing the high turn around of aircraft compared to land based. In this case I would see it as a couple of Fi167 supporting the attackadding a dice. I need justification, that’s mine.
Doesn't mean we have to like it. But to be fair, land based bombers aren't that powerful in the game anyway. I rarely see them in play. The Sturmovik isn't too bad from the Forward Air Base, but it is costly. That will probably be the best way to play the Me 410.
The IJN Carrier Liberation Force - "Because We Care" Join the IJNCVLF. Service Guarantees Citizenship!
But we have made a precedent with the Fw190 Fighter Bomber which have both restriction and per this way should have land fighter restriction only and then not the bomber restriction part... Poor Fw190
Yeah, it was a no-win situation on that card. Be inconsistent within the card by allowing Expert Bomber but not Expert Dogfighter, or be inconsistent in the card universe by precluding Expert Bomber for the first time.
But we have made a precedent with the Fw190 Fighter Bomber which have both restriction and per this way should have land fighter restriction only and then not the bomber restriction part... Poor Fw190
Yep.
Großadmiral Swizzle
Browncoat by fandom; Cossack by blood; American by birth; Virginian/Husband/Father by wife; Libertarian by choice; Human by race; Christian by grace.
Breaking down our Land Based SA units with Expert Abilities;
Fighters; Kamikaze: Sorry nothing their; No AA value; Not a Dive Bomber Folgore 202; Expert DogFighter Beaufighter; Expert DogFighter; No Mission selection for Torpedo value
Dive bombers; Sonia; Expert Bomber Both Stuka's; Expert Bomber Pe-2; Expert Bomber Il-2M; Expert Bomber--Expert Torpedoes Only thing with the Russian Units they need other nations help
The way i see it, based on this the Fighters were early growing pains or the UK and Italy's need for some air war at sea zap; the Stuka's were amended for Carrier use and the IL 2M was made for a nation with no carriers;; other nation intensions for involvement a side note for game play. Sonia and Pe-2 along with Land Fighter Bomber are products of Expansion. So i guess you can say its their baby love or leave it. RB did just fine with what he created and if your in love with expansion do what every body else does make your own SA and or card, than do what i do pull out the weeds [not talking about him] and use the flowers.