Post by nagato01 on Jan 8, 2018 1:18:49 GMT
So one thing that has always bamboozled me is that fighters that strafe ships successfully don't have some kind of effect on its Anti-Air capabilities. It is a fact of WWII that fighters that strafed ships successfully resulted in AA mounts being destroyed and bombers having a clearer path of attack. But in W@S no such penalty exists other than damage done by a strafing attack, which can only really be successfully done against destroyers. One of the biggest examples I know is that when the Yamato was sunk, it was done by this method: 1. fighters strafe the battleship, knocking out the AA guns 2. dive bombers hit the ship to do more damage 3. torpedo bombers (most vulnerable) move in on the ship, now less effectively able to fire its AA, and make their attacks successfully. Why didn't RB include any rules about this?
