Dumbest Squadron Possible in WAS

I figure not.  It doesn't really appear on the twin engine fighters, as far as I'm aware.  I took into account card space for the SA's to be as ridiculous, realistic, and space efficient as possible. This arrangement feels the most silly to me because:

1. no "fighter-bomber" means that this is a Armor 7 bomber which can't get expert bomber (makes sense considering fighter pilots would be using these rather than anyone trained for bombing things in the case that they were used in that role, similar to how a Hellcat could carry a torpedo),

2. it forces the opponent into a horrible choice of whether or not to escort the bombers, since one fighter won't escort, two will mean that there won't be enough bombers to get through late-war USN AA, and no fighter escort means that you could have 10-12 dice rolled at your bombers (this would make sense considering the aircraft was meant to be scrambled and slaughter bomber formations at high speed, long before they reached the fleet).

Albeit, the Tigercat probably could take any prop and most early jets in a dogfight, so long as it remained a vertical one, so Advanced fighter wouldn't be wrong, really.

I've forgotten about what might be an even dumber carrier plane from WWII: the XTB2D Skypirate, which is a single-engine torpedo bomber which could carry 4 torpedoes (or probably 4x 2000lb bombs for alt. payload).  Mix between a Sparvierro and an Avenger?

Here is a night fighter version of the card (F7FN) we came up with. No bombs or torpedoes and a bit less insane then the version leading this post. At the time made, we figured that had it been available in WW2, it would more likely end up being land based vs put on a carrier due to having failed carrier deck suitability trials. If I recall, it couldn't safely land on a single engine on a carrier.  I can't recall why the designer (one of the San Diego group members) opted for a night fighter but there it is.