I suggest you check the wording and the clarification document in the goldmine wagon
Ive indicated a personal preference and simply await more feedback
I have and you’re wrong.
You’re a project manager you show be unbiased and leaving personal preferences out of it. You should only be concerned about what is best for the game.
Per the rulebook wording of historical restrictions.
HMAS Melbourne - 1945 Speed 2 Capacity 2
MG 0/-/-/- AA 6/-/-/-
A 2 V8 H3
Empire Air Training - Fighters, Dive Bombers, and Torpedo bombers from the United Kingdom can base on this Carrier.
In 1944 the Australian war cabinet adopted a proposal to assist the Royal Navy with its manpower shortages by providing intake to the RAN sufficent to crew a light carrier of the Colossus class and its aircraft. Along with a number of escorts. The changing fortunes of war meant that a transfer of ships couldn't be agreed with the UK government. Australia would later aquire two Majestic class carriers in the late 40s.
Displacement 13,200 tons (standard) 18,000 tons (full load) Length 690 ft (210 m) (flight deck) 695 ft (212 m) overall Beam 80 ft (24 m) Draught 18 ft 6 in (5.64 m) (standard) 23 ft 3 in (7.09 m) (full load)
Speed 25 knots Range 12,000 nautical miles Complement 1,050 Armament 6 × 4-barrelled 2 pounder anti-aircraft guns 16 × twin 20 mm Oerlikon mountings
An ability that requires a clarification is not kiss.
The wording that provides UK carriers the capability to base US aircraft in the specific historic restrictions optional rules is the basis of the ability. It at that point the wordier definition was deemed neccesary. There is no logical reason not to follow that example