Post by weedsrock2 on Jul 18, 2024 21:18:43 GMT
Everyone okay with this? Do we want Harassing Fire 3 as well? IMO it is a zero cost SA. Cost of 7 would still be consistent with other 7 pt Destroyers of this size/stats with Close Escort.
Yerivan
Destroyer - 1942
Points 7
Speed 2
Mg 5 5 4
AA 5
TT 2 2 1
Asw 4
Close Escort - The sector this unit is in can contain three friendly Ships instead of two.
HARASSING FIRE 3: While undamaged, this unit can make range-3 Main Gunnery attacks using its range-2 attack value. It only scores hits on a 6 when using this ability.
Soviet shipbuilding was unable to match the complexity of the modern destroyer Tashkent. Thus a simplified derivative was sought. Initially, 14Project 48 destroyers were planned but none were ever completed and only 3 were ever started. Post war, modernised was proposed the incomplete hulls but never eventuated
Yerivan
Destroyer - 1942
Points 7
Speed 2
Mg 5 5 4
AA 5
TT 2 2 1
Asw 4
Close Escort - The sector this unit is in can contain three friendly Ships instead of two.
HARASSING FIRE 3: While undamaged, this unit can make range-3 Main Gunnery attacks using its range-2 attack value. It only scores hits on a 6 when using this ability.
Soviet shipbuilding was unable to match the complexity of the modern destroyer Tashkent. Thus a simplified derivative was sought. Initially, 14Project 48 destroyers were planned but none were ever completed and only 3 were ever started. Post war, modernised was proposed the incomplete hulls but never eventuated
