Good Morning..I think...quite strident there my friend...no biggie. I have a 12 unit build ready to go..was just asking. These are friendly games after all.
Know how that can be, did several chores yesterday myself. Just to say this, your mentioning YOUR table rules as to accepting things as offered, quite the outspoken one there..not really any big deal but did come as a surprise & unexpected....so, with that said, the Vodka game does not have a clear winner since, by the rules of the game, the objective is Contested since there are enemy units adjacent to the objective. That being the rules & you are being a bit of a stickler to table rules & whatnot...we should finish that game off to have a CLEAR winner & not a contested objective. Also, you said Expanded Rules will ALWAYS be used, am I to figure this also means the Optional rules are also in this statement..Grazing Fire, Enfilade etc or are those to be agreed on prior to play? These are Friendly games...not tournaments, where there is more involved. Just some of my thoughts here...let's keep it friendly shall we...
Here is cut paste from the Vodka scenario. ".....and the first team to occupy the objective in the casualty phase alone wins. Game play continues until there is a clear winner".
1. The conditions for a win are clearly stated. "the first team to occupy the objective in the casualty phase alone wins". Which I did!
2. There was no turn limit stated, rather, simply a clear winner was needed. The first statement defines what a win is. "the first team to occupy the objective in the casualty phase alone wins".
Perhaps this wasn't a good idea, i think i will graciously back out. No hard feelings, it just didn't work out. Cheers!
As you wish...I am sorry it has gone this way. No hard feelings here either, just a bit disappointed. I am willing to put things behind & try again...your call there.