Considering the Tempest us also 1944, I say it's fine. Honestly, overall while it's not as powerful as it's American cousin at attacking BB, it's more powerful overall due to its flexibility...
The TBF Avenger is just broken. It screws air up the way the Hagaro does ijn cruisers. 43 is not going to be the end of the world for gameplay, just the nomaclenture shuffles again
Nah, I'm fine with this one being 1944. The reason I said the Tempest us that in 1944, the UKnwould get their high end fighters and high end bomber... im just happy to get them...
Last Edit: Apr 18, 2023 17:08:25 GMT by texasarcher
Fuel capacity: Fuel 330 US gal (275 imp gal; 1,249 L) in three center-section integral tanks + 2x 58 US gal (48 imp gal; 220 L) droppable slipper tanks under outer wings, with provision for a jettisonable 275 US gal (229 imp gal; 1,041 L) bomb-bay ferry tank.; Oil 32 US gal (27 imp gal; 121 L)
up to eight 3.5-Inch (89 mm) Forward Firing Aircraft Rockets, 5-inch (127 mm) Forward Firing Aircraft Rockets or High Velocity Aerial Rockets
Bombs:
Up to 2,000 lb (907 kg) of bombs or
1 × 2,000 lb (907 kg) Mark 13 torpedo or Mark 24 mine (Fido) acoustic homing torpedo
Dive Bomber 1944 Bomb 9 TT 3 ASW 3 A5 V9 H1
MISSION SELECTION: This unit counts as either a Dive Bomber or a Torpedo Bomber. (Choose the unit's role when you place it during the Air Mission phase.)
RAIDER HUNTER: This unit rolls one extra attack die when making attacks against Cruisers and Auxiliary units.
RUGGED: When an enemy unit rolls successes against this unit exactly equal to its vital armor and would destroy it, roll a die. On a 4 or higher, abort this unit instead.
The Royal Navy standardised aircraft naming with the United States navy. Which the Tarpon renamed to Avenger as the aircraft began to see frontline service on British carriers. Used in support of raids against the Tirpitz in norway and Far East. Fleet Air Arm Avengers launched the longest ranged strike by that force of the war to attack the heavy cruiser Haguro on may 14 1945. Damaging the cruiser for loss of 1 aircraft. Allowing Allied destroyers to corner and destroy the cruiser tje next night. Hagaro was the last major japanese loss outside home waters.
Umm, no. I will just say no Avenger should exceed the original Set II one which is over pumped already.
I think this one needs to go back to the drawing board and start over with some reduced expectations.
It is a torpedo bomber. It did standard glide bomb attacks. (The Barracuda was mis-classified IMO. The RN didn't even believe in dive bombing. But it is a good unit and doesn't need to be made obsolete by this one either)
(Two more paragraphs of rant deleted here]
Torpedo Bomber First Delivered to RN June 8, 1943 (TBF-1 Tarpon - later variants called the Avenger) Year 1943 Cost 14 Bomb 9 ASW 3 Torpedo 3 5/8/1
SAs
Mission selection -
Rugged - IF you give it 8 vital armor instead of 9. Which would be more accurate. Like the TBF-1
Nothing else needed. Avengers are bumping the power ceiling pretty hard.
The IJN Carrier Liberation Force - "Because We Care" Join the IJNCVLF. Service Guarantees Citizenship!
Okay. I will get on the card. I think 1943 and the "Tarpon" name will work. Considering the Avenger is 1942 and the Barracuda is 43. The Barracuda still has some value at a cost of 12. We can explain the name change in the fluff.
Thank you!
The IJN Carrier Liberation Force - "Because We Care" Join the IJNCVLF. Service Guarantees Citizenship!
My references say the Tarpon was rarely equipped with torpedoes. With a strong 9 bomb attack I think dropping the torpedo line to 2 and dropping the cost to 13 would give this card a better "slot" in the game amongst the other carrier bombers. Just a suggestion. Maybe add an SA that gives +1 die to a bomb attack on Installations at no cost.
The IJN Carrier Liberation Force - "Because We Care" Join the IJNCVLF. Service Guarantees Citizenship!